Part 4 · 1 chapters · ~8 min
Behavioural and Leadership
What behavioural rounds score at senior and staff level, the STAR structure weighted towards actions, a bank of eight reusable stories, influence without authority, conflict, failure, ambiguity, growing others, quantifying results, follow-up questions to expect, and avoiding the common traps (we instead of I, no result, blaming others).
5
Stories with decisions and numbers
code
STORY: influence without authority (adapt for "conflict", "ambiguity") S Payout failures were 310 support tickets/month; three teams owned three rail integrations differently. T No one owned the cross-team problem; I was a senior engineer on one of the three teams. A - Pulled 6 months of failures from the warehouse and tagged causes: 70% from inconsistent retries/reconciliation - Wrote a 2-page strategy (diagnosis, policy, actions); reviewed 1:1 with each team lead before any meeting - Proposed my team build the shared adapter first, so others adopted something working, not a mandate - When one lead objected (their roadmap was full), offered to migrate their rail ourselves R Two rails migrated in a quarter; failures down 58%; reconciliation became a launch gate for new rails. Learned: pre-wiring 1:1s made the review meeting a formality.
Expect follow-ups: "What would you do differently?", "What did the person who disagreed think?", "How did you measure that?" Interviewers dig until they find the edge of what you personally did; prepare the details.
EIGHT STORIES THAT COVER MOST QUESTIONS
prepare these once; adapt them to each question
swipe the figure sideways, or tap expand for full screen
1/4
STAR, with a twist
Situation and task briefly (20%), actions in detail (60%), result with numbers (20%). Say "I" for what you did; interviewers score your decisions, not the team's.
actions are 60% of the story"I", not "we"